https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160556 Under Article 22(5) and preventive detention law, only documents relevant and vital to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be supplied. A bail application is not automatically a vital document in every case; its non-supply matters only if its contents contain material facts or conditions bearing on detention. Here, the detention order noted that the detenu had already been released on bail, and the bail order and remand order were furnished. Because the bail application merely stated that the offence was said to be bailable, its separate supply was not required. The detention order was therefore not vitiated by non-supply of the bail application. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160556 Under Article 22(5) and preventive detention law, only documents relevant and vital to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be supplied. A bail application is not automatically a vital document in every case; its non-supply matters only if its contents contain material facts or conditions bearing on detention. Here, the detention order noted that the detenu had already been released on bail, and the bail order and remand order were furnished. Because the bail application merely stated that the offence was said to be bailable, its separate supply was not required. The detention order was therefore not vitiated by non-supply of the bail application. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160556