https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160555 The Supreme Court held that the Agreement governing the use of the name "Baker" by the 2nd Respondent Company was valid and enforceable, dismissing the Division Bench's decision to vacate the interim injunction. The Court emphasized the importance of upholding contractual agreements to protect intellectual property rights and prevent unfair competition. The Trial Court was directed to proceed with the trial promptly, with the Supreme Court's observations considered prima facie and not to influence the trial court's decision. en-us Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160555 The Supreme Court held that the Agreement governing the use of the name "Baker" by the 2nd Respondent Company was valid and enforceable, dismissing the Division Bench's decision to vacate the interim injunction. The Court emphasized the importance of upholding contractual agreements to protect intellectual property rights and prevent unfair competition. The Trial Court was directed to proceed with the trial promptly, with the Supreme Court's observations considered prima facie and not to influence the trial court's decision. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160555