https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160553 A declaration extending preventive detention under section 9(1) was invalid because the detaining authority lacked relevant material to form a genuine subjective satisfaction that the detenu was engaging, and was likely to engage, in transporting smuggled goods. Reliance on past incidents and older statements, without any post-release incident or current basis for the conclusion, showed that the satisfaction was mechanical rather than the result of informed consideration of relevant material. Continued detention could not therefore be sustained. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160553 A declaration extending preventive detention under section 9(1) was invalid because the detaining authority lacked relevant material to form a genuine subjective satisfaction that the detenu was engaging, and was likely to engage, in transporting smuggled goods. Reliance on past incidents and older statements, without any post-release incident or current basis for the conclusion, showed that the satisfaction was mechanical rather than the result of informed consideration of relevant material. Continued detention could not therefore be sustained. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160553