<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 950 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241285</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s Miscellaneous Petition seeking rectification of the order under Section 54EC(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s failure to invest the entire capital gains in the specified asset led to the application of clause (b) of Section 54EC(1). The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of statutory provisions, rejected attempts to manipulate transactions for undue benefits, and affirmed the validity of the original order. The decision underscored the Tribunal&#039;s duty to uphold legal principles, dispense justice fairly, and maintain consistency in its orders based on legal precedents and principles of fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 950 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241285</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s Miscellaneous Petition seeking rectification of the order under Section 54EC(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s failure to invest the entire capital gains in the specified asset led to the application of clause (b) of Section 54EC(1). The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of statutory provisions, rejected attempts to manipulate transactions for undue benefits, and affirmed the validity of the original order. The decision underscored the Tribunal&#039;s duty to uphold legal principles, dispense justice fairly, and maintain consistency in its orders based on legal precedents and principles of fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>