<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 945 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241280</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed deductions claimed for legal fees, civil work, and transfer charges under Section 54, citing lack of evidence and failure to establish the expenses as part of the purchase cost of the new asset. However, the tribunal granted partial relief by allowing a reduced deduction for improvement expenses on the sold property, considering the nature of the expenditure and the time elapsed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 945 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241280</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed deductions claimed for legal fees, civil work, and transfer charges under Section 54, citing lack of evidence and failure to establish the expenses as part of the purchase cost of the new asset. However, the tribunal granted partial relief by allowing a reduced deduction for improvement expenses on the sold property, considering the nature of the expenditure and the time elapsed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>