<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 944 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the retainership fees as &quot;Professional Income&quot; rather than &quot;Salary,&quot; overturning the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of the expenses claimed against this income to ensure their eligibility under the IT Act. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, instructing the AO to verify the expenses in line with the new classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 944 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the retainership fees as &quot;Professional Income&quot; rather than &quot;Salary,&quot; overturning the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of the expenses claimed against this income to ensure their eligibility under the IT Act. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, instructing the AO to verify the expenses in line with the new classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>