<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 937 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s Customs House Agent (CHA) license revocation was invalid due to a violation of natural justice principles. The appellant was not properly informed about hearing dates, leading to a lack of opportunity to defend themselves. Discrepancies in serving hearing notices were noted, resulting in the proceedings being deemed unfair. Consequently, the revocation order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 05:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 937 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s Customs House Agent (CHA) license revocation was invalid due to a violation of natural justice principles. The appellant was not properly informed about hearing dates, leading to a lack of opportunity to defend themselves. Discrepancies in serving hearing notices were noted, resulting in the proceedings being deemed unfair. Consequently, the revocation order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>