<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 785 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160540</link>
    <description>A commission agent carrying on sales business in Tamil Nadu is treated as the dealer for consignment sales made on behalf of an out-of-State principal, so assessment must be made on the agent for that turnover. Section 2(g) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 includes such an agent within the definition of dealer, while Rule 6(h) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 only permits deduction from the principal&#039;s turnover where tax has already been paid by the agent. The decisive distinction is between the person liable to assessment and the person from whom tax may later be recovered. The principal could not be directly assessed again for the same sales, and the assessment was therefore impermissible in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 785 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160540</link>
      <description>A commission agent carrying on sales business in Tamil Nadu is treated as the dealer for consignment sales made on behalf of an out-of-State principal, so assessment must be made on the agent for that turnover. Section 2(g) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 includes such an agent within the definition of dealer, while Rule 6(h) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 only permits deduction from the principal&#039;s turnover where tax has already been paid by the agent. The decisive distinction is between the person liable to assessment and the person from whom tax may later be recovered. The principal could not be directly assessed again for the same sales, and the assessment was therefore impermissible in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>