<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 803 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160534</link>
    <description>Cancellation of registration under section 8-A(1-B) could not be sustained where it was made without notice or a reasonable opportunity of hearing, because the order entailed civil consequences and had to comply with natural justice. The dealer was therefore entitled to be heard before any cancellation was finalised. Since the Trade Tax Officer proceeded without notice, the cancellation order should have been set aside and the issue of cancellation decided afresh after hearing the dealer. The first appellate authority&#039;s remand was justified, but the order required modification to reflect that the cancellation itself could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:40:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 803 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160534</link>
      <description>Cancellation of registration under section 8-A(1-B) could not be sustained where it was made without notice or a reasonable opportunity of hearing, because the order entailed civil consequences and had to comply with natural justice. The dealer was therefore entitled to be heard before any cancellation was finalised. Since the Trade Tax Officer proceeded without notice, the cancellation order should have been set aside and the issue of cancellation decided afresh after hearing the dealer. The first appellate authority&#039;s remand was justified, but the order required modification to reflect that the cancellation itself could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>