<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 935 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160530</link>
    <description>Under section 12-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, facts specially within the assessee&#039;s knowledge had to be proved by the assessee in assessment proceedings. A colliery certificate showing non-lifting of part of the allotted coal was insufficient, because no material showed that the balance coal did not enter Uttar Pradesh or was sold elsewhere; the burden therefore remained undischarged and taxability was upheld. On turnover, the absence of books of account and sale-rate evidence justified the Tribunal&#039;s estimated figure, and no arbitrariness or legal error was shown in the estimate. The assessment as affirmed by the Tribunal was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:29:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 935 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160530</link>
      <description>Under section 12-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, facts specially within the assessee&#039;s knowledge had to be proved by the assessee in assessment proceedings. A colliery certificate showing non-lifting of part of the allotted coal was insufficient, because no material showed that the balance coal did not enter Uttar Pradesh or was sold elsewhere; the burden therefore remained undischarged and taxability was upheld. On turnover, the absence of books of account and sale-rate evidence justified the Tribunal&#039;s estimated figure, and no arbitrariness or legal error was shown in the estimate. The assessment as affirmed by the Tribunal was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>