<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1016 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160529</link>
    <description>Escaped turnover proceedings under section 16(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 operate independently of the original assessment under section 12(2); turnover already assessed in the original assessment cannot be set off against turnover later found to have escaped assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s reduction of escaped turnover by reference to the earlier assessed turnover was inconsistent with the scheme of section 16 and the distinction between original assessment and reassessment of escaped turnover. Penalty had to be refixed on the higher escaped turnover sustained, because the penalty followed the suppression finally determined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:29:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1016 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160529</link>
      <description>Escaped turnover proceedings under section 16(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 operate independently of the original assessment under section 12(2); turnover already assessed in the original assessment cannot be set off against turnover later found to have escaped assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s reduction of escaped turnover by reference to the earlier assessed turnover was inconsistent with the scheme of section 16 and the distinction between original assessment and reassessment of escaped turnover. Penalty had to be refixed on the higher escaped turnover sustained, because the penalty followed the suppression finally determined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>