<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 925 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160501</link>
    <description>An administrative rejection of an eligibility certificate was held unsustainable because it was made without affording the affected party a hearing; the decision was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. The Court also rejected delay as a bar, finding that a delay of about one year and six months, without demonstrated prejudice to the respondents, did not justify refusal of relief. The petition therefore succeeded, and the impugned decision did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 925 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160501</link>
      <description>An administrative rejection of an eligibility certificate was held unsustainable because it was made without affording the affected party a hearing; the decision was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. The Court also rejected delay as a bar, finding that a delay of about one year and six months, without demonstrated prejudice to the respondents, did not justify refusal of relief. The petition therefore succeeded, and the impugned decision did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>