<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 928 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160498</link>
    <description>A challenge to an administrative notification concerning the administration of specified tax statutes was held to fall within the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal&#039;s domain, not the High Court&#039;s writ jurisdiction. The Tribunal&#039;s scope under Article 323-B of the Constitution and Sections 6 and 8 of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987 was read broadly to cover levy, assessment, collection, enforcement, and connected or incidental matters. The word &quot;administer&quot; in the notification was given a wide meaning, and procedural or vires challenges to such a notification could be examined by the Tribunal. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:57:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 928 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160498</link>
      <description>A challenge to an administrative notification concerning the administration of specified tax statutes was held to fall within the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal&#039;s domain, not the High Court&#039;s writ jurisdiction. The Tribunal&#039;s scope under Article 323-B of the Constitution and Sections 6 and 8 of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987 was read broadly to cover levy, assessment, collection, enforcement, and connected or incidental matters. The word &quot;administer&quot; in the notification was given a wide meaning, and procedural or vires challenges to such a notification could be examined by the Tribunal. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>