<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (8) TMI 27 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160493</link>
    <description>A bounded import-licensing scheme that allowed discretion up to a prescribed maximum did not create an enforceable right to the full export value. Scrutiny of applications based on evidence of inflated export values and misuse of the export promotion scheme was treated as a non-arbitrary measure justified by public interest and foreign exchange considerations, so the reduced licence did not violate Article 19(1)(g). No Article 14 breach was shown because there was no reliable material that truly similarly situated exporters, including those with comparable inflation or misconduct, were treated more favourably. The licensing action was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (8) TMI 27 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160493</link>
      <description>A bounded import-licensing scheme that allowed discretion up to a prescribed maximum did not create an enforceable right to the full export value. Scrutiny of applications based on evidence of inflated export values and misuse of the export promotion scheme was treated as a non-arbitrary measure justified by public interest and foreign exchange considerations, so the reduced licence did not violate Article 19(1)(g). No Article 14 breach was shown because there was no reliable material that truly similarly situated exporters, including those with comparable inflation or misconduct, were treated more favourably. The licensing action was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>