https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160492 Mandatory narcotics-law requirements require prior information triggering a warrantless entry, search or seizure to be recorded in writing and promptly reported to the immediate superior. Non-compliance may prejudice the defence by depriving it of the earliest account of the alleged contraband movement and can undermine the prosecution. The statutory presumption of culpable mental state may be rebutted by circumstances arising from prosecution evidence, including lack of evidence of knowledge, conspiracy or prior association, an accused's limited transport role, and identification of other persons as principal offenders. These circumstances may create reasonable doubt over conscious possession or knowledge. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160492 Mandatory narcotics-law requirements require prior information triggering a warrantless entry, search or seizure to be recorded in writing and promptly reported to the immediate superior. Non-compliance may prejudice the defence by depriving it of the earliest account of the alleged contraband movement and can undermine the prosecution. The statutory presumption of culpable mental state may be rebutted by circumstances arising from prosecution evidence, including lack of evidence of knowledge, conspiracy or prior association, an accused's limited transport role, and identification of other persons as principal offenders. These circumstances may create reasonable doubt over conscious possession or knowledge. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160492