<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 920 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241255</link>
    <description>The case centered on the dispute regarding the applicability of Works Contracts (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007 to ongoing projects. The appellant initiated payment under the new rules from October 2007, while the Revenue contended that the rules did not apply to ongoing projects. The issuance of a show cause notice resulted in the confirmation of tax dues, interest, and penalties. The appellant argued that the demand was time-barred, as the notice was issued beyond the prescribed period. The court directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit for appeal admission and granted a stay on the collection of balance dues pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:13:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 920 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241255</link>
      <description>The case centered on the dispute regarding the applicability of Works Contracts (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007 to ongoing projects. The appellant initiated payment under the new rules from October 2007, while the Revenue contended that the rules did not apply to ongoing projects. The issuance of a show cause notice resulted in the confirmation of tax dues, interest, and penalties. The appellant argued that the demand was time-barred, as the notice was issued beyond the prescribed period. The court directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit for appeal admission and granted a stay on the collection of balance dues pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>