<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 918 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241253</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court held that the Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty under Section 78 imposed on authorized dealers of Honda cars. The Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for reconsideration. The Tribunal, considering the appellants&#039; timely payment of service tax, invoked section 80 and set aside penalties under sections 76 and 78, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 918 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241253</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court held that the Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty under Section 78 imposed on authorized dealers of Honda cars. The Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for reconsideration. The Tribunal, considering the appellants&#039; timely payment of service tax, invoked section 80 and set aside penalties under sections 76 and 78, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>