<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 905 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the disallowance of preliminary and pre-operative expenses written off under section 35D, finding them eligible for amortization due to their direct relation to the extension of the undertaking. However, the claim for a higher deduction under section 80IB was dismissed as it was raised for the first time at the appellate stage and not before the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 905 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the disallowance of preliminary and pre-operative expenses written off under section 35D, finding them eligible for amortization due to their direct relation to the extension of the undertaking. However, the claim for a higher deduction under section 80IB was dismissed as it was raised for the first time at the appellate stage and not before the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>