<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 903 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241238</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal in part, modifying the CIT&#039;s order. It directed the AO to restrict any addition under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act to the extent of accumulated income of the company. The ITAT found that while Section 2(22)(e) applied to loans and advances made by the company to the assessee, the AO had not considered these transactions in the assessment. The AO was instructed to determine the quantum of advances and adjust for credit balances before making any additions under Section 2(22)(e).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:11:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 903 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241238</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal in part, modifying the CIT&#039;s order. It directed the AO to restrict any addition under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act to the extent of accumulated income of the company. The ITAT found that while Section 2(22)(e) applied to loans and advances made by the company to the assessee, the AO had not considered these transactions in the assessment. The AO was instructed to determine the quantum of advances and adjust for credit balances before making any additions under Section 2(22)(e).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>