<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 900 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on clarifying the nature of income, application of TDS provisions, and concerns regarding potential double taxation. The Tribunal determined that the commission received by the assessee was not subject to taxation, as the subscription amount collected belonged to the network. This resolution eliminated the need to address consequential issues, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:11:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 900 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on clarifying the nature of income, application of TDS provisions, and concerns regarding potential double taxation. The Tribunal determined that the commission received by the assessee was not subject to taxation, as the subscription amount collected belonged to the network. This resolution eliminated the need to address consequential issues, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>