https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241226 The Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, addressing discrepancies in the treatment of hoarding maintenance expenses and capitalization by the Assessing Officer and CIT (A). The Tribunal restricted the disallowance to the appropriate portion of expenses, considering future income generation from the median hoardings agreement. The total income was determined at Rs.1,47,61,441 after the adjustments. en-us Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241226 The Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, addressing discrepancies in the treatment of hoarding maintenance expenses and capitalization by the Assessing Officer and CIT (A). The Tribunal restricted the disallowance to the appropriate portion of expenses, considering future income generation from the median hoardings agreement. The total income was determined at Rs.1,47,61,441 after the adjustments. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241226