<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 880 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241215</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the order of the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the company&#039;s status as a dealer, not a manufacturer. The court found the demand for duty not tenable, as the company was registered as a dealer and not engaged in manufacturing. Previous judgments related to duty payment by dealers were deemed applicable, and the appeal lacked merit. The court concluded that the revenue&#039;s substantial question did not warrant consideration, upholding the tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 880 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241215</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the order of the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the company&#039;s status as a dealer, not a manufacturer. The court found the demand for duty not tenable, as the company was registered as a dealer and not engaged in manufacturing. Previous judgments related to duty payment by dealers were deemed applicable, and the appeal lacked merit. The court concluded that the revenue&#039;s substantial question did not warrant consideration, upholding the tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>