<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 877 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the admissibility of cenvat credit on Low Sulphur Heavy Stock (LSHS) used for steam and electricity generation in the manufacture of fertilizer. The Tribunal held that the respondent was not eligible for the credit based on a Supreme Court decision. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent regarding the imposition of a penalty, citing the complexity of Cenvat Credit Rules and lack of justification for penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 877 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the admissibility of cenvat credit on Low Sulphur Heavy Stock (LSHS) used for steam and electricity generation in the manufacture of fertilizer. The Tribunal held that the respondent was not eligible for the credit based on a Supreme Court decision. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent regarding the imposition of a penalty, citing the complexity of Cenvat Credit Rules and lack of justification for penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>