<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 868 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241203</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the assessee concerning unexplained gifts, disallowance of personal expenses, and unexplained investment in gold ornaments. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the additions made were beyond the scope of Section 153A and deleted the consequential additions. The issue regarding the admission of additional evidence was dismissed as it was not strongly argued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 868 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241203</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the assessee concerning unexplained gifts, disallowance of personal expenses, and unexplained investment in gold ornaments. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the additions made were beyond the scope of Section 153A and deleted the consequential additions. The issue regarding the admission of additional evidence was dismissed as it was not strongly argued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>