<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 989 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160482</link>
    <description>Once the Tribunal accepted the decisive factual finding that the vehicle driver was carrying the declaration in Form No. 43, it had no basis to remand the matter for reconsideration on the same issue. A remand is unwarranted where the relevant fact has already been accepted and no further examination on that aspect is necessary. The High Court therefore set aside the remand order and granted relief to the assessee by allowing the writ application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 989 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160482</link>
      <description>Once the Tribunal accepted the decisive factual finding that the vehicle driver was carrying the declaration in Form No. 43, it had no basis to remand the matter for reconsideration on the same issue. A remand is unwarranted where the relevant fact has already been accepted and no further examination on that aspect is necessary. The High Court therefore set aside the remand order and granted relief to the assessee by allowing the writ application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>