<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 987 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160467</link>
    <description>The order under challenge treated the incentive scheme as conferring power on the District Level Screening Committee and the appellate authority to condone delay in filing an application and to examine the condonation request on merits. On that basis, the Rajasthan HC found no reason to interfere, and the revision was dismissed. The direction to consider the application on merits remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 987 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160467</link>
      <description>The order under challenge treated the incentive scheme as conferring power on the District Level Screening Committee and the appellate authority to condone delay in filing an application and to examine the condonation request on merits. On that basis, the Rajasthan HC found no reason to interfere, and the revision was dismissed. The direction to consider the application on merits remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>