<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 990 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160460</link>
    <description>Explanation II to section 2(38) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 was held ultra vires to the extent it deemed a works-contract sale to occur inside the State merely because the agreement was made outside the State or the goods moved from outside the State. The court held that a State cannot, by deeming fiction, tax an inter-State sale, an outside sale, or a sale in the course of import or export, because such matters fall within Parliament&#039;s field under Entry 92A of List I and remain constrained by article 286. Assessment orders based on the provision were set aside and the matters were to be reconsidered de novo without applying Explanation II.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 990 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160460</link>
      <description>Explanation II to section 2(38) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 was held ultra vires to the extent it deemed a works-contract sale to occur inside the State merely because the agreement was made outside the State or the goods moved from outside the State. The court held that a State cannot, by deeming fiction, tax an inter-State sale, an outside sale, or a sale in the course of import or export, because such matters fall within Parliament&#039;s field under Entry 92A of List I and remain constrained by article 286. Assessment orders based on the provision were set aside and the matters were to be reconsidered de novo without applying Explanation II.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>