<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 794 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160449</link>
    <description>Expenditure on seigniorage, metal breaking, loading and unloading, and transport of metal used in road works formed part of taxable turnover under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act because the contractor extracted, processed, transported, and incorporated the metal into the works contract. The metal became the contractor&#039;s property after extraction and conversion, and the cost of obtaining and using it was part of the value of goods transferred in execution of the contract. Applying the deemed sale principle on incorporation, the Court held that ancillary procurement charges were includible in the contractual transfer price, and the assessments were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 794 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160449</link>
      <description>Expenditure on seigniorage, metal breaking, loading and unloading, and transport of metal used in road works formed part of taxable turnover under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act because the contractor extracted, processed, transported, and incorporated the metal into the works contract. The metal became the contractor&#039;s property after extraction and conversion, and the cost of obtaining and using it was part of the value of goods transferred in execution of the contract. Applying the deemed sale principle on incorporation, the Court held that ancillary procurement charges were includible in the contractual transfer price, and the assessments were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>