<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 933 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160444</link>
    <description>A regular final assessment supersedes a provisional assessment, and only the final assessment governs tax liability and recovery. Where the final assessment accepts the assessee&#039;s position and no tax liability survives, penalty cannot be imposed on the basis of the earlier provisional assessment. In the absence of tax avoidance or evasion, the jurisdiction to levy penalty does not arise. The penalty demand notice was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:34:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 933 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160444</link>
      <description>A regular final assessment supersedes a provisional assessment, and only the final assessment governs tax liability and recovery. Where the final assessment accepts the assessee&#039;s position and no tax liability survives, penalty cannot be imposed on the basis of the earlier provisional assessment. In the absence of tax avoidance or evasion, the jurisdiction to levy penalty does not arise. The penalty demand notice was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>