<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 923 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160441</link>
    <description>Promissory estoppel could not be relied on to claim sales tax exemption once the earlier concessionary regime was repealed and replaced by the Assam Industries (Sales Tax Concessions) Act, 1987; the claim had to be assessed under the statute then in force, and estoppel cannot compel the Government to act contrary to law. The industry also failed the statutory definition of a &quot;new industrial unit&quot; because it had been operating since 1962 and did not satisfy the Act&#039;s eligibility condition that effective steps be completed within the prescribed period. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:24:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 923 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160441</link>
      <description>Promissory estoppel could not be relied on to claim sales tax exemption once the earlier concessionary regime was repealed and replaced by the Assam Industries (Sales Tax Concessions) Act, 1987; the claim had to be assessed under the statute then in force, and estoppel cannot compel the Government to act contrary to law. The industry also failed the statutory definition of a &quot;new industrial unit&quot; because it had been operating since 1962 and did not satisfy the Act&#039;s eligibility condition that effective steps be completed within the prescribed period. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>