<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1065 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160438</link>
    <description>Accepted electricity consumption of 7,692 units provided a factual basis for determining production and turnover, and the turnover fixed by the appellate authorities could not stand without a reasoned foundation. As no basis was given for fixing turnover at the stated figure, the determination was set aside. The matter was remitted for fresh redetermination of turnover on the basis of the accepted electricity consumption figure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:13:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1065 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160438</link>
      <description>Accepted electricity consumption of 7,692 units provided a factual basis for determining production and turnover, and the turnover fixed by the appellate authorities could not stand without a reasoned foundation. As no basis was given for fixing turnover at the stated figure, the determination was set aside. The matter was remitted for fresh redetermination of turnover on the basis of the accepted electricity consumption figure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>