<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 925 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160437</link>
    <description>The appeals were partially allowed, with penalties reduced to Rs. 10,000 per case for transporting consignments without necessary documents. The court emphasized compliance with procedural requirements and penalties as deterrents, acknowledging no intent to evade tax. The appellants were entitled to a refund or adjustment, with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:07:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 925 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160437</link>
      <description>The appeals were partially allowed, with penalties reduced to Rs. 10,000 per case for transporting consignments without necessary documents. The court emphasized compliance with procedural requirements and penalties as deterrents, acknowledging no intent to evade tax. The appellants were entitled to a refund or adjustment, with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>