<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CLARIFICATION REGARDING APPLICABILITY OF PROVISIONS OF SECTION 40(a)(ia) WITH REGARD TO AMOUNT NOT DEDUCTIBLE IN COMPUTING INCOME CHARGEABLE UNDER HEAD &#039;PROFITS AND GAINS OF BUSINESS OR PROFESSION&#039; ON CONFLICTING INTERPRETATIONS BY JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=52596</link>
    <description>The Board clarifies that under Section 40(a)(ia) the term &quot;payable&quot; includes amounts payable at any time during the previous year and expressly includes amounts actually paid during the previous year without deduction of tax at source, thus attracting disallowance; where a High Court decision contradicts this departmental view, the CCIT must notify the CTC for priority examination to determine whether to pursue further proceedings or seek legislative amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CLARIFICATION REGARDING APPLICABILITY OF PROVISIONS OF SECTION 40(a)(ia) WITH REGARD TO AMOUNT NOT DEDUCTIBLE IN COMPUTING INCOME CHARGEABLE UNDER HEAD &#039;PROFITS AND GAINS OF BUSINESS OR PROFESSION&#039; ON CONFLICTING INTERPRETATIONS BY JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=52596</link>
      <description>The Board clarifies that under Section 40(a)(ia) the term &quot;payable&quot; includes amounts payable at any time during the previous year and expressly includes amounts actually paid during the previous year without deduction of tax at source, thus attracting disallowance; where a High Court decision contradicts this departmental view, the CCIT must notify the CTC for priority examination to determine whether to pursue further proceedings or seek legislative amendment.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=52596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>