<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 864 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241199</link>
    <description>For levy of State Development Tax, aggregate turnover had to be computed with reference to the entire assessment year, not only the period before the VAT Act commenced mid-year. The court held that turnover &quot;during the assessment year&quot; remained the governing unit of computation, and the change in tax regime from 1 January 2008 did not create a separate method of calculation or exclude later turnover. Because the dealer continued business throughout the year, the full-year turnover was rightly taken into account, and liability to pay the tax was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 864 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241199</link>
      <description>For levy of State Development Tax, aggregate turnover had to be computed with reference to the entire assessment year, not only the period before the VAT Act commenced mid-year. The court held that turnover &quot;during the assessment year&quot; remained the governing unit of computation, and the change in tax regime from 1 January 2008 did not create a separate method of calculation or exclude later turnover. Because the dealer continued business throughout the year, the full-year turnover was rightly taken into account, and liability to pay the tax was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>