<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 860 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241195</link>
    <description>Channel placement and carriage fees paid by broadcasters for improved frequency access and wider viewership were held taxable as Business Auxiliary Service for the relevant period, because the activity promoted the broadcaster&#039;s service; the later Business Support Service entry did not apply retrospectively. By contrast, the demand on lease rental for the fibre optic cable network was remanded because the record did not establish the statutory basis for Leased Circuit Service, and the confirmation under Telecommunication Service went beyond the show-cause notice. Limitation and penalty were also sent back for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 860 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241195</link>
      <description>Channel placement and carriage fees paid by broadcasters for improved frequency access and wider viewership were held taxable as Business Auxiliary Service for the relevant period, because the activity promoted the broadcaster&#039;s service; the later Business Support Service entry did not apply retrospectively. By contrast, the demand on lease rental for the fibre optic cable network was remanded because the record did not establish the statutory basis for Leased Circuit Service, and the confirmation under Telecommunication Service went beyond the show-cause notice. Limitation and penalty were also sent back for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>