<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 855 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the expenditure incurred by the applicant for collection activities should be subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Services. It noted the need for further examination beyond the figures from the expenditure side to determine the true value of services provided. The Tribunal expressed doubts about whether the fees paid to the applicant as a Collection Agent adequately reflected the actual value of services rendered, emphasizing the necessity for a deeper analysis. Additionally, the Tribunal acknowledged the importance of assessing any changes in the nature of the transaction during the relevant period. The applicant was directed to deposit a specified sum within a set period, with certain penalties waived and recovery stayed during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 855 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the expenditure incurred by the applicant for collection activities should be subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Services. It noted the need for further examination beyond the figures from the expenditure side to determine the true value of services provided. The Tribunal expressed doubts about whether the fees paid to the applicant as a Collection Agent adequately reflected the actual value of services rendered, emphasizing the necessity for a deeper analysis. Additionally, the Tribunal acknowledged the importance of assessing any changes in the nature of the transaction during the relevant period. The applicant was directed to deposit a specified sum within a set period, with certain penalties waived and recovery stayed during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>