<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 822 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was required to produce clearance from the empowered Committee of Secretaries for restoration of appeal No. C/796/2007, dismissing the application due to lack of clearance. The Tribunal distinguished a previous case where clearance was granted, emphasizing the unsatisfactorily explained delay in filing the restoration application. It rejected the argument that the Supreme Court&#039;s recall of judgments in ONGC case had retrospective effect, affirming the validity of the dismissal order until the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment date. The appellant&#039;s pursuit of clearance for over three years led to the rejection of the restoration application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:47:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 822 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was required to produce clearance from the empowered Committee of Secretaries for restoration of appeal No. C/796/2007, dismissing the application due to lack of clearance. The Tribunal distinguished a previous case where clearance was granted, emphasizing the unsatisfactorily explained delay in filing the restoration application. It rejected the argument that the Supreme Court&#039;s recall of judgments in ONGC case had retrospective effect, affirming the validity of the dismissal order until the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment date. The appellant&#039;s pursuit of clearance for over three years led to the rejection of the restoration application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>