<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 819 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Rectification of Mistake application challenging the confiscation of rice, redemption fine, and penalty in a customs case. The main issue was the limitation period for issuing the Show Cause Notice, with the applicant arguing it should be within 6 months from detention, while the Tribunal held it should be from the seizure date. Citing legal precedents, including a Kolkata High Court judgment and a Supreme Court ruling, the Tribunal concluded that the Notice must be issued within 6 months only for returning goods, not for seizure continuation. The ROM application was dismissed on 17-8-2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:47:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 819 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Rectification of Mistake application challenging the confiscation of rice, redemption fine, and penalty in a customs case. The main issue was the limitation period for issuing the Show Cause Notice, with the applicant arguing it should be within 6 months from detention, while the Tribunal held it should be from the seizure date. Citing legal precedents, including a Kolkata High Court judgment and a Supreme Court ruling, the Tribunal concluded that the Notice must be issued within 6 months only for returning goods, not for seizure continuation. The ROM application was dismissed on 17-8-2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>