<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 803 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, determining that the duty, interest, and penalty were paid within the stipulated period, indicating the closure of proceedings under Section 11A(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Revenue&#039;s challenges regarding incomplete proceedings and alleged clandestine clearance were dismissed. The respondents were found entitled to cum-duty benefit based on established legal precedent. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was deemed lacking in merit and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:45:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 803 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, determining that the duty, interest, and penalty were paid within the stipulated period, indicating the closure of proceedings under Section 11A(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Revenue&#039;s challenges regarding incomplete proceedings and alleged clandestine clearance were dismissed. The respondents were found entitled to cum-duty benefit based on established legal precedent. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was deemed lacking in merit and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>