<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1188 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160426</link>
    <description>Rajasthan HC explained that &quot;goods under transport&quot; under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act refers to goods handed over to a carrier and remaining in the carrier&#039;s custody until delivery, not goods personally carried by the owner as a passenger. On that footing, the transport-based objection could not defeat penalty under section 22A(7). The Court also held that section 22C places the declaration obligation on the importer bringing notified goods into the State for use, consumption or disposal; where the importer admittedly brought goods from outside the State without the prescribed declaration, non-compliance was established and penalty action was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1188 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160426</link>
      <description>Rajasthan HC explained that &quot;goods under transport&quot; under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act refers to goods handed over to a carrier and remaining in the carrier&#039;s custody until delivery, not goods personally carried by the owner as a passenger. On that footing, the transport-based objection could not defeat penalty under section 22A(7). The Court also held that section 22C places the declaration obligation on the importer bringing notified goods into the State for use, consumption or disposal; where the importer admittedly brought goods from outside the State without the prescribed declaration, non-compliance was established and penalty action was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>