<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 930 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160403</link>
    <description>An efficacious statutory appeal ordinarily weighs against writ intervention in fiscal matters, but the court may still examine the controversy on merits where circumstances justify it. In this commentary, the seizure of registers was treated as lawful because reasons were recorded and the power was exercised on suspicion of tax evasion. The seized records were shown to the assessee on several occasions before assessment, and repeated opportunities to respond were not used. A best judgment assessment based on those materials was therefore regarded as bona fide and rational, with no violation of natural justice, and the related penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:01:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 930 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160403</link>
      <description>An efficacious statutory appeal ordinarily weighs against writ intervention in fiscal matters, but the court may still examine the controversy on merits where circumstances justify it. In this commentary, the seizure of registers was treated as lawful because reasons were recorded and the power was exercised on suspicion of tax evasion. The seized records were shown to the assessee on several occasions before assessment, and repeated opportunities to respond were not used. A best judgment assessment based on those materials was therefore regarded as bona fide and rational, with no violation of natural justice, and the related penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>