https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160392 The court upheld the constitutionality of incorporating entry 80A in the First Schedule of the APGST Act by Amendment Act No. 27 of 1996. It dismissed the writ petitions, ruling that the classification of poultry feed supplements for a higher tax rate was justified and did not violate constitutional provisions. The court affirmed the Legislature's discretion in tax matters and rejected claims of colorable legislation. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:21:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160392 The court upheld the constitutionality of incorporating entry 80A in the First Schedule of the APGST Act by Amendment Act No. 27 of 1996. It dismissed the writ petitions, ruling that the classification of poultry feed supplements for a higher tax rate was justified and did not violate constitutional provisions. The court affirmed the Legislature's discretion in tax matters and rejected claims of colorable legislation. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 03 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160392