<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1248 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160388</link>
    <description>Section 55 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act permits rectification by the assessing, appellate or revisional authority, but once an assessment has merged in the first appellate order, the assessing authority cannot treat the original assessment as still open. After disposal of the appeal, rectification must be sought before the authority competent to act on the appellate order. A refusal to entertain a rectification request under Section 55 is not an appeal against the original assessment, and revision under Section 33 lies against such refusal. The Deputy Commissioner&#039;s rejection on a mistaken jurisdictional basis was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision on rectification merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1248 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160388</link>
      <description>Section 55 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act permits rectification by the assessing, appellate or revisional authority, but once an assessment has merged in the first appellate order, the assessing authority cannot treat the original assessment as still open. After disposal of the appeal, rectification must be sought before the authority competent to act on the appellate order. A refusal to entertain a rectification request under Section 55 is not an appeal against the original assessment, and revision under Section 33 lies against such refusal. The Deputy Commissioner&#039;s rejection on a mistaken jurisdictional basis was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision on rectification merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>