<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1063 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160383</link>
    <description>An exemption notification under the U.P. Trade Tax Act was treated as operating prospectively only, because it could not be given retrospective effect without clear authority. The exclusion of N.P.K. 23:23:0 from the exemption granted to similar phosphatic and potassic fertilisers was also found unsustainable, since fiscal classification within the same broad commodity class requires a rational basis and mere compositional difference was insufficient. On that reasoning, tax recovery on sales of N.P.K. 23:23:0 for the relevant period was not permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1063 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160383</link>
      <description>An exemption notification under the U.P. Trade Tax Act was treated as operating prospectively only, because it could not be given retrospective effect without clear authority. The exclusion of N.P.K. 23:23:0 from the exemption granted to similar phosphatic and potassic fertilisers was also found unsustainable, since fiscal classification within the same broad commodity class requires a rational basis and mere compositional difference was insufficient. On that reasoning, tax recovery on sales of N.P.K. 23:23:0 for the relevant period was not permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>