<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 590 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160375</link>
    <description>Amounts compulsorily set apart under a statutory molasses storage maintenance fund were not taxable income because the assessee had no unrestricted dominion over the money and could use it only for the controlled statutory purpose. The court also treated interest on excess levy sugar price as an accrued, crystallised liability under the levy sugar price equalisation scheme, not a contingent provision, and held it deductible as revenue expenditure. Both referred questions were answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 590 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160375</link>
      <description>Amounts compulsorily set apart under a statutory molasses storage maintenance fund were not taxable income because the assessee had no unrestricted dominion over the money and could use it only for the controlled statutory purpose. The court also treated interest on excess levy sugar price as an accrued, crystallised liability under the levy sugar price equalisation scheme, not a contingent provision, and held it deductible as revenue expenditure. Both referred questions were answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>