https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241131 The Tribunal concluded that the two contracts dated 24.08.2007 should be treated as separate and distinct for service tax purposes. The explanation to Rule 3(1) introduced on 07.7.2009 does not apply to these contracts. The appeal by the appellant was allowed, and the cross-objection by the Revenue was rejected. en-us Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 May 2014 10:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241131 The Tribunal concluded that the two contracts dated 24.08.2007 should be treated as separate and distinct for service tax purposes. The explanation to Rule 3(1) introduced on 07.7.2009 does not apply to these contracts. The appeal by the appellant was allowed, and the cross-objection by the Revenue was rejected. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241131