<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 792 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241127</link>
    <description>Service tax under reverse charge was prima facie not payable in India where overseas branches rendered services to foreign customers, the services were performed and consumed outside India, and local tax had allegedly been paid abroad. Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 was viewed as applying only when services are received in India by a person in India, which was not shown on the facts. The Tribunal also noted that service tax is a destination-based consumption levy and that the activity could fall within export of service under Rule 3 of the Export Service Rules, 2005. The demand was therefore not sustained at that stage and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 792 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241127</link>
      <description>Service tax under reverse charge was prima facie not payable in India where overseas branches rendered services to foreign customers, the services were performed and consumed outside India, and local tax had allegedly been paid abroad. Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 was viewed as applying only when services are received in India by a person in India, which was not shown on the facts. The Tribunal also noted that service tax is a destination-based consumption levy and that the activity could fall within export of service under Rule 3 of the Export Service Rules, 2005. The demand was therefore not sustained at that stage and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>