<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 782 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of lease rentals, setting aside the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the classification of rental income from property as business income and the treatment of income from letting out furniture and fixtures as business income. The decisions were based on precedents and the specific circumstances of each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:11:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 782 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of lease rentals, setting aside the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the classification of rental income from property as business income and the treatment of income from letting out furniture and fixtures as business income. The decisions were based on precedents and the specific circumstances of each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>