<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 771 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241106</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for thorough verification and substantiation of claims in cases involving unexplained income under Section 68 of the Act and related additions. The ITAT directed the AO to verify the transaction through brokers, assess genuineness, and examine supporting documents to ensure a fair hearing and a fresh decision based on substantial evidence provided by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:11:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 771 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241106</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for thorough verification and substantiation of claims in cases involving unexplained income under Section 68 of the Act and related additions. The ITAT directed the AO to verify the transaction through brokers, assess genuineness, and examine supporting documents to ensure a fair hearing and a fresh decision based on substantial evidence provided by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>