<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 766 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal for confiscation and penalties under the Customs Act. It found no valid reason to impose penalties on the respondents as the violations specified under Section 111 were not established. The goods were not rendered liable to confiscation under Section 111, and the Tribunal distinguished the facts from previous cases cited in the appeal. The decision underscores the importance of establishing clear violations to justify penalties under the Customs Act, ensuring a fair application of penalties in customs-related cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:10:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=339590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 766 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal for confiscation and penalties under the Customs Act. It found no valid reason to impose penalties on the respondents as the violations specified under Section 111 were not established. The goods were not rendered liable to confiscation under Section 111, and the Tribunal distinguished the facts from previous cases cited in the appeal. The decision underscores the importance of establishing clear violations to justify penalties under the Customs Act, ensuring a fair application of penalties in customs-related cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>